IPB

Здравствуйте, гость ( Вход | Регистрация )

Предстоящее мероприятие:

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> New York Giants general manager Dave Gettelman is cleaning house
panxing18
сообщение Jan 30 2019, 06:47
Сообщение #1





Группа: Пользователи
Сообщений: 39
Регистрация: 26.11.2018
Из: '
Пользователь №: 6 733



Репутация:   0  


. He began a fire sale on Tuesday by trading away cornerback Eli Apple Green Bay Packers Hats , a first-round draft pick in 2016, to the New Orleans Saints for fourth- and seventh-round draft picks.On Wednesday morning, he kept at it, this time dealing one of the Giants’ very best defensive players. Nose tackle Damon Harrison is on the move, and unfortunately for fans of the Green Bay Packers, he’s headed to the NFC North. The Detroit Lions have acquired Harrison in exchange for just a fifth-round draft pick, according to reporting from NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport.Harrison broke into the NFL with the New York Jets as an undrafted free agent out of William Penn University then signed a five-year contract worth about $46 million with the Giants in 2016. In his first year with the G-Men, Harrison was named first-team All-Pro at nose tackle. That year, he recorded 2.5 sacks and a forced fumble while tallying an whopping 86 total tackles, including six for losses.Trading Harrison now will cost the Giants $1.6 million in dead money on this year’s salary cap and will shove $3.2 million more in dead money on their cap in 2019. That will leave him with a cap hit of just $7 million for the Lions next year and $9.25 million in the final year of his contract in 2020.The Lions’ depth chart at defensive tackle had been fairly thin, with just three players listed: former Bronco Sylvester Williams, who is in Detroit on a one-year, $3.5 million contract, 2016 second-round draft pick A’Shawn Robinson, and journeyman Ricky Jean-Francois Green Bay Packers Hoodie , a former Packer. Harrison appears to be an immediate upgrade over any of those players and should see significant snaps immediately in Detroit.The Packers will play the Lions next in week 17, closing out the regular season against them at Lambeau Field.Packers ideally positioned to make a run at Khalil Mack if he becomes available It’s the kind of move that can only reasonably happen in Madden. The team with the best offensive player in the league trades for arguably the best defensive player. Even the most deranged fans generally shy away from calling up their local radio station or podcast host to insist their team make a move like the one being discussed among Packers Nation right now:Trade for Khalil Mack. Unwilling to play the last year of his deal at his current price, the 2016 Defensive Player of the Year hasn’t practiced with the Raiders in training camp and has no plans to do so. Reports have Mack’s camp at odds with Oakland management to the point they’re not even actively involved in negotiations. As this fight grows bitter, conversations have bubbled up about a potential trade. Over the weekend, OddSharks posted odds on where Mack would be playing by mid-fall and the Packers had better odds than the Raiders — in fact, they had better odds than all 31 other NFL teams. Brian Gutekunst made a joke about calling Reggie McKenzie in a press conference last week that didn’t outright dismiss questions about whether Green Bay might be interested. But let’s, for the moment, set aside whether it’s at all likely Oakland ends up trading the best player on their team (doubtful) and narrow the focus to whether or not it makes sense for the Packers. Here’s the short answer: absolutely. The starting point of any deal, before compensation or a new contract, would be would Mack report to camp without a new contract? Green Bay’s road splits into two camps depending on the answer, but Mack has to want to play for the Packers at least in 2018 before any deal can be struck. Compensation flows from his willingness to talk deal. Gutekunst would likely be more willing to part with major assets if the precondition for any trade involved a negotiated extension. That kind of clarity with the financial future would be worth more to the Packers. If Mack is simply willing to attend training camp and play in 2018 — no deal but at least he’ll play (and we assume the Raiders will willingly trade him in this scenario) — that should be enough for Gutekunst to pull the trigger. No new contract needs to be negotiated ahead of time. If he’ll come to camp and play in 2018, help the Packers compete for a Super Bowl, that’s worth what it would likely cost to get him. What would it take? There’s no recent precedent to rely on here. To find a defensive star traded in his prime, we have to go back to 2004 to the Clinton Portis-Champ Bailey deal in which the Broncos actually sent an additional pick with Bailey to get Portis.The league was wildly different then, with the value of running backs out of wack with where the game is in 2018. That kind of deal would never happen in today’s league. That said Customized Green Bay Packers Jerseys , it took a superstar player (at the time) to make that deal happen. Oakland wouldn’t give up Mack for a first-round pick at least. The question becomes how much more will it take? Brandin Cooks went for a first (twice). Likewise for Percy Harvin. Mack presents considerably more impact in a vacuum, but his contract situation looms over all of this. That may actually make a trade more intuitive from Green Bay’s standpoint. One of the ways the Packers could fit Mack’s eventual mega-deal under the cap would be to let Clay Matthews walk at the end of the 2018 season when his contract expires. Ditto for Randall Cobb. Combined, those two players leaving wipes $24 million off the books for 2019. Justin Houston holds the biggest cap number of any pass rusher in football right now at $20.6 million for 2018. Simply washing their hands of those contracts more than frees up enough space to sign Mack. Instead of allowing Matthews to leave in free agency, why not just deal him now? Jon Gruden clearly loves established veterans and already spent on bringing in a past-his-prime former Packer. How about a first plus Matthews (the Raiders can sell it as still wanting to compete) plus another pick, let’s call it a fourth that can turn into a third if Mack plays 16 games?That would be well worth the risk even if Mack isn’t signed to a contract outright as part of the deal (Remember, the baseline here is assuming Mack will come play in Green Bay for the one season on his deal). It’s the chance to go win a Super Bowl with the best offensive-defensive 1-2 punch in the league since Favre-White for a first and a mid-round pick. Plus the Packers would still keep one of their firsts, whether it’s their own or the Saints pick, so they’re not having to mortgage their short-term future for short-term gain. Theoretically, a Super Bowl run and the biggest contract in football for a defender would assuage any fears Mack would have about playing in Green Bay. On the other hand, Mack is from a small town in Florida and played in Buffalo and may not shy away from the quaint (by NFL standards) feel of the NFL’s tiniest market. Rodgers proves it’s easy enough to be a star there. Whether or not Reggie McKenzie or Jon Gruden would actually be willing to pull the trigger on any deal for their star defender doesn’t feel like much of a debate. Cooler heads will likely prevail and the potential loss of money for Mack sitting out actual games should spur a deal. But Gruden may just be zany enough to push this to the bring, doing irreparable damage to the relationship with their star. If it gets to that point, Gutekunst should stick to his word that they would be in every discussion for available players. Green Bay would be uniquely positioned both financially and from a trade capital perspective to pull the trigger on a blockbuster. Trading a beloved star and a future pick for a possible one-year rental may seem like a lot, but when weighed against the possibility of winning a Super Bowl feels like a reasonable price to pay.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic
1 чел. читают эту тему (гостей: 1, скрытых пользователей: 0)
Пользователей: 0

 



Текстовая версия Сейчас: 18th February 2019 - 21:26